Gamemeny editor Jan Kuzovlev went to the office EA , To be one of the first to play a release version Dragon Age: Inquisition. https://bc-game-casino.co.uk/ He spent three hours behind her, saw a prologue, performed several side quests and got a couple of new satellites. Avoiding spoilers and premature conclusions, he will talk about three important things that BioWare did in their history about dragons and the Inquisition.

The first reason: Inquisition is not arranged like the latest games from BioWare

Dragon Age: Inquisition For BioWare – In many ways, the key project and the change of paradigm. This is a game of completely different sizes: after the chamber story about the fate of the city of Kirkwell and its inhabitants, the entire Tedas continent opens before us, and in terms of the degree of study and interactivity, it is seriously different from what we saw in Dragon Age And Mass Effect.

We explain: in the last two stories about Shepard, not a continent at our disposal, but the whole galaxy. But when it comes to research, the player faces hard restrictions: the cosmic epic is built as a string of hermetic linear levels, mandatory and not very. You fulfill a series of instructions, then go on the plot mission, after which several more missions open, and so on. In breaks, you can go to chat with the Normandy crew and study the cocktail menu in the bar on the omega.

A similar situation has developed with Dragon Age 2 – There, we recall, there is a large and beautiful city of Kirkwell, consisting of several quarters, but with the main stream of quests, we still sorted out separate, often the same locations: we fulfilled small requests, collected money, solved the problems of comrades. The game summed up intermediate results in critically important key missions (like an expedition to the mountains), after which the story moved forward, new plot and side tasks opened.

Dragon Age: Inquisition does not depart from the usual structure. The conditional block diagram “Prologue, the first set of levels and side quests, an important plot solution and a critical mission, then a set of levels, again a key mission” has not disappeared anywhere. But within its framework, the player has much more freedom.

Firstly, some global decisions will be mutually exclusive and will close the part of the story from the player. Previously in Dragon Age An important quest could pass almost the same for everyone-you fight with monsters and monsters, and then, at the end of the mini-scenario, make a fateful decision-you support, say, werewolves or elves. This choice influenced which sides helps you in the decisive battle, but almost did not come back in the course of the main part of the game.

Now some solutions open independent quests branches. The scheme is slightly reminiscent of what we saw in " Witcher ", But on a more modest scale. Producer of the game Cameron Lee He said that the first such choice will be to enlist the support of one of two factions, and an individual storyline is registered for each for several hours.

Secondly, various regions of Tedas are not at all close linear levels, but huge open locations with their ecosystem, attractions and quests. There are abandoned forts somewhere, in the distance you can see a lake, nearby a fishing hut. Above the emerald lawn, the dragon soars, in the sky a spatial gap is ominously green, from which devils and demons climb. The latter, by the way, is the main catalyst for the conflict in the game.

Dragon Age: Inquisition It connects this vast space with different trifles, constantly encourages to explore the environment. Games of the series work by a similar principle The Elder Scrolls: you agree to the trivial assignment “go-bring”, you see something interesting along the way, you subscribe to a couple of quests, go down to the cave that is not obligatory for passing and die with a terrible death from a giant poisonous spider.

An additional incentive to study every corner – almost all our actions somehow bring the Inquisitions benefits. When we conquer abandoned fortresses, the influence of the Inquisition is growing. We destroy the monsters and close the faults – the influence of the Inquisition is growing. The more powerful the organization, the more operations we can organize and the more efficient our associates work.

The second reason: even more experiments with side mechanics

The inquisitor with his team has a separate location-hub-this is a small settlement and fortress Skychold next to him. Our allies live in Skykhold, a military council is gathering there and further actions are planned to unite Tedas in the face of a global threat. IN Dragon Age: Inquisition There is another layer – this is a global card with which we command intelligence, send people to tasks and observe expansion.

It works like this: exploring different places and fulfilling instructions, we get “power points”, the price of which can then open additional locations or move on the plot.

For three hours of the game, I managed to see only two open levels – after the prologue and a couple of mandatory assignments, the game stops driving you by the handle and allows you to walk in the first vast territory. A little later, when the Inquisition is fixed in the region, we can move further on the plot for the same points of power and go to negotiations with unpleasant people in Orley. Or then to study Ferelden and order the scouts to open two more large -scale levels on the map – one of them is terribly uncomfortable, in gloomy swamps, the other with the ever -raging sea, sparkling zippers and ships of templars broken into chips. In each such location, you can spend a lot of time and completely forget that somewhere there, in the eagle, the Inquisition still needs to do business.

In addition, on a global map, we distribute minor instructions to our advisers and, quite possibly, we can send in the future to the tasks of the Sopartians. Collect gold, go to the dungeon for a rare artifact – all this is done automatically, in real time. Remember how we managed the brotherhood of the Assassins from Revelations, or trading regime from Assassin’s Creed 4: Black Flag. Gold to the treasury will be brought in twenty-five minutes, it will take to search for an artifact for about an hour.

Another additional layer and incentive to engage in different things is the general influence of the organization. The completion of tasks and the solution of problems entail an increase in the wire organization in the level, and for each level, the perks that affect our heroes and their abilities are given. Somewhere new options begin to appear in the dialogue, the characters learn to hack doors and chests on tasks or just get some minor bonuses.

Skyhold himself and the adjacent settlement will gradually develop. The fortress expands, its appearance is gradually changing. A separate line of handicraft quests is associated with the settlement – we collect drawings and consumables on the maps, improve equipment, prepare new potions.

A separate story here with fortresses at the levels – I did not reach them, but in past demonstration videos BioWare showed that in some places you can conquer strategically important points where the garrison is sent, and with their help to change global conditions at the level. On one of the desert cards, the possession of the fort allows you to remove poisonous miasms from the canyon and open access to a new location.

In a word, c Inquisition intentionally add additional mechanics that hold the player's attention in different ways. They are trying to give all this a clear meaning – something similar was observed in Mass Effect 2 , where in the end we chose a team for a fateful mission. Several factors influenced success: the loyalty of our allies, the degree of preparedness of Normandy for enemy attacks … We were preparing for this task almost all the adventure. It turned out the game in the game. Well, here this idea is developed in full.

Reason is the third: the role system got rid of the excess

The basis of role -playing mechanics in BioWare took the scheme from the second part. The skills system was simplified and made extremely understandable. However, they added interesting little things.

From Inquisition The iconic three warrior-mag-prickname has not disappeared anywhere, but in each class now there are four main development branches instead of six, as in Dragon Age 2. The sorcerer, for example, these are three elements – fire, ice, electricity – and additional talent: energy management. Each branch has its own philosophy – fire balls are needed in order for the enemy to panic and lose orientation in space, the cold fetters opponents and makes them more vulnerable to the attacks of other comrades, and so on.

Skills are made so that their effects do not duplicate each other. The frosty sorcerer puts the trap, manipulates with space and teleports away from threats. Electricities acts straightforwardly, beats with one spell of several enemies at once, and whenever he successfully conjures, runs into the crowd to discharge static electricity into the space. He also creates an awkward atmosphere around himself, in the conditions of which a lightning can fall on the enemy at any time.

During the passage, we did not find additional specializations, but for each class in Inquisition Those planned for three pieces. Most likely, the character will be able to choose and study only one discipline.

From Inquisition, healing witchcraft was almost finally removed – our party is bypassed by bottles of red liquid and protective spells. The potions are replenished automatically at transshipment points, there you can also prepare additional elixirs, with other effects. This is important because after each skirmish health does not restore – you have to plan each action and actively use new mechanics of magicians and warriors.

Sorcerers know how to impose a protective barrier on themselves and allies for a while, not missing attacks. Through the use of some skills, fighters gradually raise a separate defense indicator – a kind of second strip of health, a “buffer”, which allows a warrior to take on more damage. This is another reason to apply skills that distract the attention of opponents to a well -protected warrior.

IN Inquisition much more attention pays the positioning of fighters. Templars carry immense growth shields with them, so you can’t take them either with a weapon or magic on the forehead, you have to go around the flank and knock them down. Sorcerers teleport and scatter witchcraft icy mines to the field. Ghosts impose weakening curses on the characters, and dragons have slightly more or less vulnerable places.

And here is a very tactical pause to the place. By pressing the button, the game freezes, we give orders and then with a smooth movement of the trigger we bring our entire plan into effect. Let the trigger let go, and the figures are likely – it will be possible to assess the situation, change the teams, and rebuild fighters. The tactical regime is spectacular, but it does not always work as planned: in tight rooms, the camera cannot rise high above the battlefield, and giving commands it becomes inconvenient.

Another important point: enemies in Inquisition Almost never appear from the air (except for demons – they materialize around the breaks, if they do not close them). Therefore, there is no such thing that you were locked in a cramped courtyard, and then they lowered several waves to the party, it is not clear where the enemies came from nowhere. IN Dragon Age 2 This was a serious drawback, since to win the crowd needed to control and correctly combine the skills of different classes. But when the mess is happening on the battlefield, and not through your fault, but through the fault of the game designer, playing “from tactics” becomes very uncomfortable.

* * *

I deliberately did not talk about what is happening in Inquisition from the point of view of the plot, simply because I did not have time to see almost nothing. Trying to delve into the plot in the three hours that I managed to spend the game is completely ungrateful, and I decided to devote more time to the side mechanics and get better into how new elements work.

And it is better to evaluate the whole story, and soon we will be able to do it. Before the exit Dragon Age: Inquisition There is very little left.

Heavy Rain does not need to be presented: along with God of War 3 This game is the most anticipated PS3 exclusive next year. Interactive thriller from authors Fahrenheit (the best game of 2005 according to the version of “Gambling”), in which the player not only solves puzzles and goes through Quick Time Events, but physically repeats every any significant effect of the hero, and all his actions somehow affect the plot of the tragedy that is played out On the screen. A detailed story about the background of the project and its place in the modern gaming industry can be read in the big material that we published in Light Gamery No. 5/2009.

In anticipation of a quick release, we spent several hours alone with the Heavy Rain preview version and carefully studied several episodes from the first half of the game.

Morning in the pine forest

The main question, which demo version does not answer: is that cunning system of causal relationships that David Cage has been working with such perseverance in every interview? Apparently, this will finally become clear only after the release: in order to understand how the actions of some heroes affect the fate of others, the game must be passed entirely, preferably – several times.

Today, Heavy Rain looks more like a matured fahrenheit: https://god-odds-casino.co.uk/ there are no dizzying jumps from a flying helicopter to a roller gas outlet, but everything related to the plot, characters and directing is about ten times intensified about ten times. However, the developers begin from afar: Itan Mars, a successful architect, wakes up a sunny morning in the bedroom of his own suburban house. On the floor in front of the door – a note from his wife: she left to take the children from school and will return soon to prepare everything necessary for a party on the occasion of the birthday of their eldest son, Jason.

The prologue lasts about ten minutes, and all this time the players will impatiently fidget in the chair: how so, where the promised mysterious killings? Instead of unraveling the ominous secrets, we are offered to wander around the house, admire the balcony for a wonderful summer day, brush your teeth (also a small QTE), and also shows the buttocks of Itan while it takes a shower.

Quantic Dream pumps the atmosphere deliberately slowly, like a professional Spanish inquisitor, leisurely stretching the sacrifice on the rack. First, they show us a scene full of drama, in which Itan loses Jason in a human hypermarket, moves through the crowd for a long time and calls his son. He does not hear, leaves the shopping center, and at the nearest intersection, the car knocks it down to death.

Then one more unbearably long episode follows. A few years after the tragedy, Itan survived a painful gap with his wife and was forced to move to a close lup in the industrial zone. In this scene, he takes Sean, the youngest son, from school, prepares dinner for him, makes lessons with him, is looking for a plush bear around the house and puts to sleep. The “Origami-killer” recalls only the title in the newspaper, which Mars finds in the hallway, and a strange letter in which the unknown writes some nonsense about children who have not returned from school.

Night of long knives

Until this moment, Heavy Rain does not at all excite the imagination: the actors play it no matter, the main characters do not want to empathize (Itan, similar to the sad double of Russell Crowe, pulls the plowman for his eternal acidic mine), and the maniac killer is still in no hurry.

However, the next few chapters are completely dedicated to the FBI agent Norman Jayden and the private detective Scott Shelby-these two independently investigate the “Origami-killer” case. This is where it becomes clear what the creators of Fahrenheit have been doing all these years. Quantic Dream perform in a familiar genre and their favorite scenery: dirty streets, industrial areas, dilapidated corridors of cheap motels. Prostitution. Corrupt practices. Despair. Disgusting weather – in Fahrenheit it was continuously snowing, but then everything does not want to stop rain.

Tragic episodes are played before our eyes one after another. Shelby comes to a shabby clip to interrogate an important witness – a prostitute whose son became a victim of a maniac. Here he is trying to protect her from an aggressive client – follows a spectacular scene of a fight with a fight of dishes and a bang of furniture. Jaden, sitting in a car, with a trembling hand, takes a glass test tube with an incomprehensible substance of bright blue color from his pocket (we suspect that he is a drug addict) and sharply hides it back. And after fifteen minutes, Itan Mars reappears on the screen and performs in a completely new role: it turns out that after the death of the eldest son of the architect, strange failures began to torment in memory that happened to him during the rain.

During all this time, we are shown only one scene of violence (a fight in the apartment of prostitutes), they do not show a single corpse, even there is no blood really. Perhaps the developers want to save all this for the second half of the game, but it is also possible that Quantic Dream is simply in no hurry to attract the player's attention to the anatomical details and offer to focus on the heroes and invisible threads of fate that connect them.

By the way, Heavy Rain characters look very cool. Even secondary ones seem to be endowed with their own character and insignificant, but interesting details. The lively chief of the police, having lived to the gray hair, did not learn how to tie a tie and asks for help from a federal agent. The psychoanalyst is barely noticeably whispering, and a cunning half -smile always plays on his lips. On the toilet table in the dwelling of a prostitute, right next to pink beads and a fluffy fan, is a photograph of the murdered son ..

Groundhog Day

And of course, we cannot ignore non -linearity. Within the framework of each scene, the character can behave differently. There are much more behavior options in comparison with Fahrenheit, and inattentive players risk missing a lot: if a private detective tries to bribe a grief mother, she will drive him out in a mear. And if Itan decides to send his son to sleep ahead of time, then in his next replica he will hear the annoyed notes of an approaching transitional age (“You do not give me freedom! I hate you!") – this would not have happened if we allowed the child to sit a little by the TV.

* * *

As planned by the authors, all our actions should somehow influence the plot of the game. In demo, we saw several prerequisites for this: what, for example, will happen if the detective forgets to leave his business card to the witness? What will happen if the agent misses one of the evidence at the crime scene? Will something change in the fate of the hero if he does not tell the therapist about inexplicable failures in memory? While these are just hints: we repeat, you can fully evaluate the picture only by going through the game. But even if Heavy Rain turns out to be a high -tech variation on the Fahrenheit topic, we will not be offended by the developers, the main thing is to tell you how the matter ends! And it would be nice to quickly.

Game Formula: 50% fahrenheit + 50% of modern technologies

While you are waiting:

• The Last Express – PC
• Mor. Utopia – PC (5/10, "Gambling" No. 7/2005)
• Braid – PC , Xbox 360 , PS3 (9/10, "Gambling Light" No. 2/2009)

Percentage of readiness: 80%

Exit date: 2010

According to the old tradition, testing of new processors turned into a real puzzle “Gather everything in one place and at the same time”. And if the motherboard was enough with excess, then I had to chase the crystal. The company helped us Asus , in the reserve of which was alone Core i7-2600K with an unlocked factor and top motherboard Asus maximus IV Extreme On the chipset P67 Express. To work with the graphic core, the motherboard sent us Gigabyte – GA-H67A-UD3H ( H67 Express ).

It's simple

It is not difficult to assemble a system on a new processor. Everything is standard: a processor in a socket, a large cooler on top Cooler Master Hyper N620 , Two ranges of the RAM nearby Kingston Hyperx DDR3-1666 2 GB each and powerful video card Zotac GeForce GTX 570. There were three test stands in total. One for acceleration (on P67 Express), the second for verification Quick Sync and a graphics (H67 Express) built into the processor, but the third is for a competitor in the person Core i7-920 ( X58 Express ).

We chose an opponent for Core i7-2600K not by chance. The first crystal from the genus Nehalem Until now, IT as the new Core i7-2600, plus, of course, it was interesting for us to see how architecture Sandy Bridge Faster than the previous one.

Opponents

The test program turned out to be so extensive that the run of the full cycle of benchmarks took us almost two weeks. We checked literally every statement Intel : Is Sandy Bridge really good in games, does it really accelerate remarkably, is it actually fast when decoding video, archiving, rendering, etc.D. We tested Core i7-2600K in standard mode, with HD Graphics on and even dispersed it to 4.6 GHz! The same was done with a competitor: at first they drove it off at the factory frequency of 2.66 GHz, and then increased it to the standard values ​​of the Core i7-2600-3.4 GHz. It is to this regime that you should pay close attention, because at the same speed the difference in architects will be visible.

Friday in the forehead

The oddities began with the very first tests. Our favorite synthetics PCMARK05 I did not see the difference between Nehalem and Sandy Bridge – the latter even managed to lag behind 3%. Of course, at standard frequencies, the new processor turned out to be 18%faster, and with acceleration to 4.6 GHz – by all 45%, but the impression was spoiled.

The next benchmark, 3DMark Vantage , He did not add optimism. The difference between architectures was some 7% in favor of Sandy Bridge. The same picture was observed with archiving files in Winrar , And with a transcoding video, and even in games. The difference in performance swam around 4-7%, no more. The only thing where Sandy Bridge turned out to be really faster is in working with Physx. Batman: Arkham asylum At maximum physics settings, he worked on a new architecture at a speed of 19 FPS, overtaking an opponent by 11%, and when accelerating to 4.6 GHz https://all-wins-casino.co.uk/ generally reached the mark of 31 FPS processor for a mark of 31.

Of course, if you compare directly processors, not architecture, you will have to admit that the Core i7-2600 is much more powerful than the old Core i7-920-by 15%. Only now this advantage is achieved rather due to more competent work with energy consumption and higher frequencies, which is somewhat discouraged, given the number of changes that Intel made to the new architecture.

Ahead of the planet

Perhaps the only indisputable plus Sandy Bridge is a built -in graphic core, namely, Quick Sync technology. Especially for it, we introduced a new benchmark. They took the program Cyberlink Mediaespresso 6.5 , We loaded a Full HD film for a year and a half Full and launched a transcoding into an iPad format with a resolution of 720p. Core i7-920 took 66 minutes, Core i7-2600K, even when accelerating to 4.6 GHz, coped with the task in 48 minutes. The GEFORCE GTX 570 involved in the help of the film took only 33 minutes-two times less than the Core i7-920. But the cooler was Quick Sync. When we launched the encoding on the graphic core of Intel, we did not believe our eyes – 12 minutes! An unambiguous record.

Unfortunately, saying the same thing about work in games will not work. In complex modes, performance falls to catastrophic 14-16 fps. We managed to achieve acceptable indicators only by dropping the settings to a low level of quality – this is the only way the games went in high resolutions from 30 and 40 personnel per second. In principle, this is the level of video cards at a price of 1000-1500 rubles-not bad. And laptops with a small diagonal of such performance will be enough for the eyes.

* * *

We will summarize. SANDY BRIDGE sensations slightly lubricated. In standard operating modes, new processors are faster than old ones, but not so much the new architecture plays a significant role here as the 32-nm technology process, economical energy consumption and due to this very high frequencies of work. At equal speeds, Sandy Bridge does not show advantages over Nehalem, and we will not recommend new processors as a replacement of crystals under LGA1366: they work approximately equally. But if you collect the computer from scratch, then pay attention to the platform with LGA1155. A variety of processors and rich potential with more than pay off the money spent.

Table 1
Technical characteristics
Characteristic Core i7-2600 Core i7-920
Process process 32-nm 45-nm
The number of transistors 995 million 731 million
Processor connector Socket 1155 Socket 1366
Frequency 3.4 GHz 2.66 GHz
The maximum frequency of Turbo Boost 3.8 GHz 2.93 GHz
Factor 34 20
L3-Cash 8 MB 8 MB
GPU frequency 850 MHz no GPU
Energy consumption 95 W 130 W
Price for February 2011 from 9000 rubles; For the version of Core i7-2600K-from 11,000 rubles from 9000 rubles
Table 2
Synthetic tests
PCMARK05
Processor model CPU Memory HDD Overall Performance ratio
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) 11 414 10 770 4830 10 895 100%
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) + HD Graphics 11 562 10 888 5224 11 161 102%
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 15 418 14 567 4353 13 853 127%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 8925 8157 5335 9013 82%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 11 596 10 870 5240 11 174 103%
3DMark Vantage
Processor model GPU CPU Overall Performance ratio
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) 21 288 20 798 22 909 100%
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) + HD Graphics 1267 21 240 1657 7%
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 21 468 24 015 25 677 112%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 20 512 17 212 19 574 85%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 21 520 20 887 21 358 93%
Cinebench R11.5 (64-bit)
Processor model X1 XN Multi Performance ratio
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) 1.32 6 4.53x 100%
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) + HD Graphics 1.37 6.26 4.59x 104%
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 1.83 6.57 3.59x 114%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 0.96 4.78 5x 78%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 1.22 5.84 4.79 96%
Winrar (File 100 MB)
Processor model X1 XN Performance ratio
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) 1025 KB/s 2813 KB/s 100%
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) + HD Graphics 1007 KB/s 2739 KB/s 97%
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 1351 KB/s 4561 KB/s 154%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 900 KB/s 2279 KB/s 83%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 1092 KB/s 2754 KB/s 100%
Table 3
Applications
Superpi 1.5 (32 MB, Loop 10)
Processor model Time Performance ratio
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) 10.4 minutes 100%
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) + HD Graphics 10.2 minutes 102%
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 7.95 minutes 124%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 13.9 minutes 77%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 11.1 minutes 93%
Cyberlink Mediaespresso 6.5 (1080p (15 GB) in Apple 720p)
Equipment Time Performance ratio
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) 56 minutes 100%
GeForce GTX 470 (CUDA) 33 minutes 169%
Intel Quick Sync 12 minutes 466%
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 48 minutes 116%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 66 minutes 84%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 54 minutes 103%
Batman: Arkham asylum (Physx Max)
Processor model High, 1680×1050 Performance ratio
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) 19 FPS 100%
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) + GeForce GTX 470 (CUDA) 59FPS 310%
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 31 FPS 163%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 13 FPS 68%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 17 FPS 89%
Table 4
Game tests (personnel per second)
Resident Evil 5 (DX10)
Processor model High, 1680×1050, AF 16X High, 1920×1080, AF 16X Performance ratio
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) 131.6 128.7 100%
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) + HD Graphics 16.1 14.3 12%
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 159 148 118%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 99.3 96.2 75%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 125.2 122.1 95%
Devil May Cry 4 (DX10)
Processor model Veryhigh, 1680×1050, AF 16X Veryhight, 1920×1080, AF 16X Performance ratio
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) 216.8 207.8 100%
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) + HD Graphics 16.5 14.7 7%
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 213.7 199.4 97%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 218.6 198.3 98%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 232.2 212.1 105%
Aliens vs. Predator (DX11)
Processor model Veryhigh, 1680×1050, AF 16X Veryhight, 1920×1080, AF 16X Performance ratio
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) 69.9 62.8 100%
Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) + HD Graphics—-
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 67.3 60.2 96%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 67.9 60.3 96%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 67.7 60.5 96%
Table 5
Price/performance ratio
Processor model Synthetic tests Applications Games General performance Price
Core i7-2600 (3.4 GHz) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Core i7-2600K (4.6 GHz) 120% 129% 103% 117% 122%
Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz) 84% 80% 90% 85% 100%
Core i7-920 (3.4 GHz) 98% 98% 98% 98% 100%